|
Topic: The Democrats | By CJP | January 10, 2008
 Mobic without prescription, Janes, here's the situation: Ever since we saw Senator Clinton tear up at a New Hampshire voters' forum, CJP has been asked again and again what "women" thought about it. Obviously, order mobic in us, Mobic professional, all women don't react the same way to anything, particularly something that involves Hillary Clinton, mobic online. Mobic buy, But because the instance is now credited with women turning out for her and propelling her to victory in New Hampshire, we're dying to know what you think, mobic cheapest price. Mobic cheap drug, Did it make her seem human to you or did it make her look weak. Did she seem genuine or contrived, find mobic online. Find cheap mobic, We're taking your pulse- so let us know what you think in our CJP poll. We'd also love to hear your comments, mobic pharmacy online, Buy mobic us, but do remember that some of you love Mrs. Clinton, buy discount mobic online, Mobic online review, some of you.....not so much. Please be respectful, mobic in us, Buy cheapest mobic, or no comments for you. Canada mobic. Buy mobic generic. Mobic order. Order generic mobic. Cheap mobic pharmacy. Mobic approved. Mobic from canada. Mobic cost. Mobic canada. Buy mobic cheap. Buy mobic low price. Buy mobic canada. Mobic drug. Order mobic. Mobic pills. Mobic no prescription. Buy cheapest mobic online. Buy mobic no rx. Purchase mobic. Buy discount mobic. Cheapest mobic online. Buy cheapest mobic on line. Mobic no online prescription. Mobic bangkok. Order discount mobic online. Mobic non prescription.
Similar posts: Cardura online without prescription. Clarina cream online without prescription. Clarinex online without prescription. Clindamycin gel online without prescription. Clofazimine online without prescription. Clozapine online without prescription. Colon clean supreme online without prescription. Combigan online without prescription. Combivent online without prescription. Combivir online without prescription.
Trackbacks from:
| 
January 10th, 2008 at 11:13 am
Hillary’s a smart gal; there’s no doubt about that. The issue for me is whether or not there was forethought regarding the tears. Any one of us might get choked up speaking about a loved one or a memory, but choking up about the political process and putting oneself “out there” would seem to take some effort, or at least a little thinking ahead. I’m sure she has genuinely teared up on other occasions, but in this case, it seemed like a little more than a gut reaction.
January 10th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Barf. Contrived. Fake.
But it worked, so perhaps it was brilliant?
January 11th, 2008 at 9:40 am
I wrote this yesterday but I think it belongs here.
1/19/08
Is it me? I’ve been watching TV and reading about Hillary’s “breakdown†on Monday. It is becoming the highlight of the political world. Now we worry that people are lying to the pollsters. This is what I think. People changed their minds after it happened, not because it happen, but because of the responses of the others. I was surprised that the woman who asked the question voted for Obama because, if I understand what she said correctly, Hillary recovered so quickly. She filled up, she didn’t have a major breakdown for heaven’s sake.
I remain convinced the vote was a direct response to the responses, like Katy’s “Barf.” I for one, do not think it was planned, that’s why she recovered so quickly. This is not the Hillary she has chosen to share with us, ever.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:42 am
I wrote this yesterday but I think it belongs here.
1/10/08
Is it me? I’ve been watching TV and reading about Hillary’s “breakdown†on Monday. It is becoming the highlight of the political world. Now we worry that people are lying to the pollsters. This is what I think. People changed their minds after it happened, not because it happen, but because of the responses of the others. I was surprised that the woman who asked the question voted for Obama because, if I understand what she said correctly, Hillary recovered so quickly. She filled up, she didn’t have a major breakdown for heaven’s sake.
I remain convinced the vote was a direct response to the responses, like Katy’s “Barf.” I for one, do not think it was planned, that’s why she recovered so quickly. This is not the Hillary she has chosen to share with us, ever.
January 11th, 2008 at 9:45 am
Completely contrived. I certainly want “change” we need it and that doesn’t include putting another Clinton in office for 4 years (possibly 8).
January 11th, 2008 at 10:38 am
Carole Ann is RIGHT ON! She didn’t breakdown. She showed emotion. Why is it so hard for people to believe that you could be disconcerted because a woman (GUYS WOULD NEVER DO THIS) actually asked you how YOU were? It’s not the typical campaign question. And for the woman who asked it to say “Oh she recovered too quickly…” HELLO? If she hadn’t “recovered” then it WOULD have been a breakdown. She pulled herself together and went on. Talk about “you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t.
January 11th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
I thought it was a plant in the audience until I saw her on the news and it turns out the woman who asked the question voted for Barack in the end!
January 11th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
The Clintons’ campaigning strategy is well thought out and planned in advance. These things don’t happen by accident. I became skeptical when she recovered so quickly and got behind her steel face. She may have been expressing her anger at trailing in the polls too. Anger can be expressed that way at times. Always with the Clintons, never trust and verify twice.
January 11th, 2008 at 2:56 pm
She was exhausted. Her eyes leaked.
January 11th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
This might be a bit off topic, so I apologize in advance for hijacking the thread. Since this site is mostly frequented by women, I have a question / though that I would like feedback on. When deciding rather or not to vote for Hillary, do you considered not only “should she be the next president, but also, “should she be the first Women president” I have include an article I wrote which will clarify this statement. (esabacz.blogspot.com) I’m curious as to how many people out there share my POV on this.
_________________________________________________
Unfortunately, I think that not only must America answer the question of “Should Mrs. Clinton be the next president” but rather, “Should Mrs. Clinton be the first woman president.” I feel there is more “up for grabs “than one presidency. Let me quantify my statement.
When our current president Bush leaves office, no matter if history portrays him has a great or horrible president, he will just be another WASP in the long line of presidential tradition (I use the term loosely). When stacked up next to all who have come before him, not much will truly stand out. We’ve had bad and good presidents before, but they will all be lumped together in our history text books under different chapters.
Now, to be the first WOMAN president is truly, a noteworthy honor. The world and history has shown us that woman can lead as good (and sometimes better) than any man. However, to be the first comes with allot of added, perhaps unnecessary, pressure. IF, Hillary is elected president and performs well, then we will see more women running for higher offices. This would also open the door for other minorities who have never held this office. But, the reverse would also be true. If, Hillary is a horrible / bad / ineffective president it could place a stigma on all future “would be Women or Minority” presidents. In short, to be the first you have to be stellar if you want to ensure that you will not be the last for a long time to come.
To put this into business perspective, let’s assume that two candidates are trying to become a CEO for a huge fortune 500 company. The first candidate is extremely young by CEO terms, while the other candidate fits the middle-aged look for most top end CEO’s currently on the market. If the younger CEO is selected and performs poorly, then the board may not be as willing to take a risk on an “out of the norm†CEO in the future. However, if the younger CEO comes in , delivers and does an absolute stellar job, it could change not only what that board looks for in a future CEO but could impact how other boards determine and select CEOs. By contrast, if the “normal†candidate is selected for CEO, it doesn’t really matter if he does good or bad. The next CEO will probably be another candidate that fits into that “normal†niche.
With that being said, my question is not “Should Hillary be the next president?” but “Should she be the first woman president, one that will usher in a new age in politics and open the political doors to Men and Women of all races and religions.” That’s the question we have to answer.